I don’t miss the camera on the Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses
News Source
•2026-10-13T14:00:00-04:00
📰 What Happened
The Verge reviewed the Ray-Ban Meta Audio, smart glasses with speakers but no camera. Reviewer Victoria Song wore them for days and found most people did not notice them. She said removing the camera made her feel less like she was spying on people. They look like normal glasses and start at $349.
The glasses play music, take calls and answer simple questions through Meta's AI. But the AI still gets confused with harder tasks. Sound quality is only decent and leaks for others to hear.
🔍 The Backstory
Smart glasses have drawn concern that wearers could secretly record people. The audio-only model avoids that problem because it cannot take photos or video. The idea is not new. Bose made audio sunglasses seven years ago that also went unnoticed.
This version is made by Meta, in a time of debate over privacy and smart glasses. Meta previously put cameras in its Ray-Bans, which drew more distrust. The reviewer said the glasses have limited uses and are expensive for what they do.
🎯 Why It Matters
If you worry about being filmed in public, camera-free glasses are a calmer option. But they cost a lot for features your phone already does well.
The Verge reviewed the Ray-Ban Meta Audio, smart glasses with speakers but no camera. Reviewer Victoria Song wore them for days and found most people did not notice them. She said removing the camera made her feel less like she was spying on people. They look like normal glasses and start at $349.
The glasses play music, take calls and answer simple questions through Meta's AI. But the AI still gets confused with harder tasks. Sound quality is only decent and leaks for others to hear.
Smart glasses have drawn concern that wearers could secretly record people. The audio-only model avoids that problem because it cannot take photos or video. The idea is not new. Bose made audio sunglasses seven years ago that also went unnoticed.
This version is made by Meta, in a time of debate over privacy and smart glasses. Meta previously put cameras in its Ray-Bans, which drew more distrust. The reviewer said the glasses have limited uses and are expensive for what they do.
If you worry about being filmed in public, camera-free glasses are a calmer option. But they cost a lot for features your phone already does well.