Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, was hit by a $6.3 billion hack that researchers described as almost certainly the largest theft of any kind in history. The exchange said it would cover all customer losses and had frozen about $3 billion of the affected assets, while analysts attributed the attack to North Korean state-backed hackers and reported never-before-seen laundering patterns.
The theft dwarfs a $1.5 billion crypto raid on a Dubai-based exchange last year and the $1 billion taken from Iraq's central bank in 2003. Tom Robinson, chief scientist at crypto consultancy Elliptic, said the incident was "almost certainly the largest theft of any kind in history", and North Korea has a documented record of using crypto proceeds to fund its weapons programmes.
Because Binance is the biggest venue in the market, its pledge to absorb customer losses is a test of whether a centralized exchange can survive a loss of this size without a bailout or insolvency. The case also sharpens scrutiny of exchange security practices, since the breach reportedly began with a single compromised employee laptop rather than a flaw in the blockchain itself.

Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, was hit by a $6.3 billion hack that researchers described as almost certainly the largest theft of any kind in history. The exchange said it would cover all customer losses and had frozen about $3 billion of the affected assets, while analysts attributed the attack to North Korean state-backed hackers and reported never-before-seen laundering patterns.

The theft dwarfs a $1.5 billion crypto raid on a Dubai-based exchange last year and the $1 billion taken from Iraq's central bank in 2003. Tom Robinson, chief scientist at crypto consultancy Elliptic, said the incident was "almost certainly the largest theft of any kind in history", and North Korea has a documented record of using crypto proceeds to fund its weapons programmes.

Because Binance is the biggest venue in the market, its pledge to absorb customer losses is a test of whether a centralized exchange can survive a loss of this size without a bailout or insolvency. The case also sharpens scrutiny of exchange security practices, since the breach reportedly began with a single compromised employee laptop rather than a flaw in the blockchain itself.

📰 Source: News Source
theguardian.com ↗
Was this article useful?