The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals denied Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and Google an early exit from thousands of lawsuits alleging they intentionally designed addictive products for minors. The court said the Section 230-based appeal came too soon and should normally follow a trial.
The thousands of suits from private individuals, state and local governments, and school districts were consolidated into one federal case. Companies argued Section 230 protected them from claims they failed to warn the public about addictive design choices, but the court declined to let that argument end the case early.
The decision keeps major platforms exposed to substantial liability over child-safety and addictive-design claims, building on earlier cases where Meta lost two jury trials on similar issues, and adds momentum for plaintiffs and regulation.

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals denied Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and Google an early exit from thousands of lawsuits alleging they intentionally designed addictive products for minors. The court said the Section 230-based appeal came too soon and should normally follow a trial.

The thousands of suits from private individuals, state and local governments, and school districts were consolidated into one federal case. Companies argued Section 230 protected them from claims they failed to warn the public about addictive design choices, but the court declined to let that argument end the case early.

The decision keeps major platforms exposed to substantial liability over child-safety and addictive-design claims, building on earlier cases where Meta lost two jury trials on similar issues, and adds momentum for plaintiffs and regulation.

πŸ“° Source: TechCrunch
techcrunch.com β†—
Was this article useful?