iPhone owners can now submit claims in Apple’s $250 million Siri AI settlement
News Source
•2026-09-21T09:36:52-04:00
📰 What Happened
iPhone owners can now claim money from Apple's $250 million Siri settlement. Apple is settling claims that it failed to deliver an AI-powered Siri.
People in the US who bought an iPhone 15 Pro, 15 Pro Max or any iPhone 16 model between 10 June 2024 and 29 March 2025 can apply. Claims close on 21 December 2026.
Payouts start at about $25 per device and can rise to $95 depending on how many people claim. Claimants must give their name, contact details and iPhone serial number.
🔍 The Backstory
The lawsuit said Apple created a clear expectation that new AI features shown at WWDC 2024 would arrive with the iPhone 16. The phones were marketed as "built for Apple Intelligence".
Instead, the iPhone 16 launched with fewer features than promised. Apple later delayed the new Siri, which finally arrived with iOS 27 this month.
Apple has denied any wrongdoing. It chose to settle the case rather than go to trial.
🎯 Why It Matters
The case is a warning to tech companies about over-promising on AI. It also shows how class actions can pay real money back to ordinary buyers.
iPhone owners can now claim money from Apple's $250 million Siri settlement. Apple is settling claims that it failed to deliver an AI-powered Siri.
People in the US who bought an iPhone 15 Pro, 15 Pro Max or any iPhone 16 model between 10 June 2024 and 29 March 2025 can apply. Claims close on 21 December 2026.
Payouts start at about $25 per device and can rise to $95 depending on how many people claim. Claimants must give their name, contact details and iPhone serial number.
The lawsuit said Apple created a clear expectation that new AI features shown at WWDC 2024 would arrive with the iPhone 16. The phones were marketed as "built for Apple Intelligence".
Instead, the iPhone 16 launched with fewer features than promised. Apple later delayed the new Siri, which finally arrived with iOS 27 this month.
Apple has denied any wrongdoing. It chose to settle the case rather than go to trial.
The case is a warning to tech companies about over-promising on AI. It also shows how class actions can pay real money back to ordinary buyers.